The best game

There is an aspect of Wednesday’s world cup semifinal scarcely captured in today’s newspapers. During the match hardly any faults were committed. Germany and Spain played an astonishing clean game, to the point that one wonders why there are so many faults in the average match. The fault is not a simple accident, not the evidence of how evil a footballer is either. Most faults are tactical. They can be done to, for example, overcome a deficiency. If a forward dribbles a defender and gets in a better position to run heading the goal, the defender has two options: compete and chase the player or commit a fault. Another use of the fault is to reset a situation that plays against you. Your opponent has taken the ball from you in the middle of an attack. Most of your team mates are not in defensive position. You kick the opponent with the ball in the ankle and gain half a minute for your players to trot, retrench and wait for the attack, but now organized. These two uses are in a way non competitive. To actually compete in the first case would mean to chase the forward and the fastest player would eventually get the price. You get him or her, good for you. You don’t, well, that’s the game. A fault would in this view be a resource to even out a situation where one of the teams has an advantage.

Yesterday we did not see faults because both Germany and Spain thought that they were the best teams in the world and only playing was enough to win. Xavi, Iniesta, Schweinsteiger, Özil are too good to use such a cheap resource. They just play. Twenty minutes went on without a fault, just forty meters passes, dribbling, one-twos… pure game. Pure competition. Pure joy.

The Swedish Government took the decision in autumn 2009 to do changes in the communication and opinion building support to Civil Society Organizations. Diakonia uses these funds to increase awareness of how global structures hinder development. The first change was to broaden the beneficiaries of the budget line from the frame development organizations to city councils and corporations. That is good. That is competition, that is game. To organizations like Diakonia it means a painful 50% budget cut on this line of financing because we are more to share the cake, but good, let’s play. The second change is to limit the content of what is financed with it to exposing, communicating. Opinion building cannot be financed with tax money. It is allowed to account for all the bridges, trainings, medicines, researches and schools that have been financed with development funds. But to question if these are the best options, to propose a different view to members of parliament, journalists, constituencies, it’s not. Now this is a fault. This is tactical. To allow us to write about the number of solar kitchens delivered but not about the politics of oil, the alpha male show off between China and the States in the climate change negotiation, is pushing us out of the core of the solution to development. And pushing us out not by outplaying civil society in an open and informed debate but by committing a fault. We make faults when we know we do not have the upper hand, or when we know we can lose it.

But here we get to the limit of the comparison. There are a difference between football and development. In football 32 teams compete for one trophy that one will win and the rest will not. Development, simplified, is one trophy but shared by all involved. This brings to the scene competition’s twin sister, collaboration. The different development stakeholders are both competitors and collaborators. There is an important competition among ways to deliver development, do not underestimate it. It is important because the most time and resources we waste the more people will continue leaving weakened, threatened or unprotected. But competition should not occupy such a space that makes collaboration of the different squads impossible. It might sound naïf given the context, but anyone working to do away with poverty is a hundred times more an ally than an enemy, so one wonders where all these faults come from.

Going back to football, the score last Wednesday could have been Germany 0- Spain 1- Football 3, being the sport itself the greatest winner. If it’s ok to get new age, rather than two teams playing football it was football itself playing through two teams. The German coach Joachim Löw, who loves the game, said after the match that Spain is the best team in the world. Diakonia promises to say that Gunilla Carlsson is the best Development Minister in the world if she thinks again who is really helping to limit the debate about development and acts accordingly. We also love the game.

Domingo Torres Santos

Flickor och kvinnor en viktig komponent för hållbar utveckling

Nu samlas de som har makten ännu en gång, denna gång i Bonn. De har uppdraget att förändra vår vackra jords accelererande fart mot en allt mer ökande miljökatastrof. UNFCCC (FN:s ramkonvention om klimatförändringar och det viktigaste forumet för internationellt klimatarbete) har tagit fram ett utkast till grunddokument för förhandlingarna. Det har växt från 50 till 300 sidor, vilket nog reflekterar en oförmåga att enas om en global strategi för att möta mänsklighetens hitintills största utmaning.

Efter Köpenhamn har jag inte så stort hopp om några revolutionerande beslut. Maktens gissel är blindhet och förnekelse. Maktens folk lever i en bubbla och vill både äta kakan och ha den kvar. De tror att det löser sig på något sätt i alla fall. De lever efter devisen ”girighet före behov” som Dr Ashok Khosla, grundare av Development Alternatives, sa på ett seminarium nyligen. ”Equity and empowerment, the missing variables in the sustainability equation”. Något saknas i den ekvation som ligger till grund för klimatförhandlingarna. Något saknas för att vända den destruktiva utvecklingen på vår planet och skapa en hållbarhet där alla får utrymme och kan leva ett värdigt liv.

Khoslas slutsats är att resurserna räcker till alla. Konflikten mellan tillväxt och miljö kräver ett radikalt omtänk. ”Change is the Only Constant” – ekvationen har bara en konstant – nämligen förändring. En verklig satsning, i stort och smått, på alternativa bränslen och teknik måste ske nu idag – inte imorgon. För att denna satsning ska bli övertygande så måste den vara socialt och ekonomiskt lönsam – liksom ett företag. I detta ser han också nödvändigheten av att aktivera flickor och kvinnor som bidragare till en hållbar utveckling. Den komponenten saknas idag i de internationella förhandlingarna. Utbildning och arbete för dem kommer att automatiskt att sänka antalet barn per familj (vilket är en känd erfarenhet sedan länge) och de barn som föds (även flickor) överlever, får utbildning och kommer ut på arbetsmarknaden. Köpkraften och marknaden mår bra av detta. Det ger då förutsättningar för utveckling av alternativ teknik och energikällor, minskar miljöproblemen och ökar möjligheten till en hållbar utveckling.

Mirjam Dahlgren, hiv/aids- och jämställdhetssamordnare

PS: Diakonias Carl-Henrik Olaison Jacobsson befinner sig på klimattoppmötet i Bonn och kommer att blogga därifrån. Håll utkik efter hans blogguppdateringar här på Diakoniabloggen!